May Blossom Logo

May Blossom Ministries

Christian Healing after Abortion

Bringing Healing to the Nations

 
 
 
 
Home Post Abortion Syndrome Healing Prayer Contact Groups News

May Blossom - News - 2011-2012


May Blossom Logo On 25 October 2012 The Daily Mail printed an article entitled "I dreamt of becoming a mother.  Now I feel like a murderer."  It was such a heart-breaking story that I submitted a comment which received so many red arrows that my comment was soon removed.  This just shows the denial mothers are in to try and justify their actions.

My comment said "How very sad that Hilary followed the advice of the doctors and allowed her baby daughter Elodie to die in such a manner.  Had she continued with the pregnancy and allowed nature to take its course she would have still held her baby after birth and no matter how long Elodie lived for Hilary would know that at least Elodie was given every opportunity to have life and that she, Hilary, had not killed her.  Yes, there was a chance that Elodie could have been still born naturally but again Hilary would not now be suffering the guilt of knowing that she had allowed a poison to be injected into her daughter's heart to kill her.  Doctor's used to take the Hippocratic Oath that says 'first do no harm'.  Sadly that is no longer the case and babies with possible disabilities are deemed not worthy of life and the parents are encouraged to kill their child in the heartbreaking way Hilary has described.  Elodie, in Hilary's view was a fighter who wanted to live.  Doctors did not allow that to happen."

The Daily Mail limits the number of words that can used for comments, but it can be seen the harm that is done to the mother when the killing of a child by abortion is recommended by doctors.  How can women seek help from the very doctors that suggested and sanctioned the very action that is causing them so much pain?

Please pray for all women who find themselves in a similar situation, that they will find the support they desperately need.


May Blossom Logo On 16 October 2012 The Daily Mail printed an article entitled Breast cancer timebomb fear: Experts warn that NHS faces crisis as number of women living with disease is set to treble to 1.7m.

My comment said: The UK Abortion Act is 45 years old on 27 October this year.  Since then the rates of breast cancer has risen in line with the rates of babies killed by abortion, especially if it was a first pregnancy as the mammary cells do not become fully differentiated until a full pregnancy takes place.  Yet this is one cause 'the experts' refuse to consider let alone admit to.  The use of contraceptive pills, implants, injections, the morning after pill etc all contain high doses of carciogen causing steriods in various doses which also affect the breast cells.  Is it any wonder so many women are suffering from now and going to suffer from breast cancer in the future when these risks are not even mentioned to women so that they can make informed choices?  When are women going to stop being treated as guinea pigs for the abortion industry and big pharma so they can continue to make their millions?

If the experts would admit the abortion and breast cancer link, and women were told and decided that perhaps it would be better not to kill their unborn child, then the rates of breast cancer would begin to drop, but not for the generations where it is too late.  Hundreds of thousands, if not millions of women were not told of the link and so were unable to give informed consent when they agreed to kill their child by abortion.


May Blossom Logo On 29 December 2011 The Daily Mail printed an article entitled More women choosing 'selective reduction' abortions when pregnant with twins and triplets.

My comment said: So, women who are so desperate to have a baby go through the trauma of IVF treatment, agreeing to or even insisting that more than one embryo is introduced to her womb to give her a greater chance for at least one to implant and then, once pregnant, she then decides that she only wants to carry one child and not multiple babies.  So she then chooses selective reduction, killing her surplus child/ren.  I am sorry, but I am finding it very, very hard to understand the mentality of anyone who could do this.  It is such a very sad reflection of today’s Godless society where life has become so cheap that even so-called desperately wanted babies can be killed – for what?  Not only has the mother chosen that her child/ren should die, but that doctors, who are supposed to ‘first do no harm’ encourage this action.  How much is this costing, not just in monetary terms, but in physical, mental, social and spiritual terms?  Whatever happened to the sanctity of life, including the unborn?

The medical profession has a lot to answer for.  Please pray that their eyes will be open to what they are encouraging to take place in the name of progress and science.


May Blossom Logo On 7 September 2011 The Daily Mail printed an article entitled MP loses bid to curb abortion providers' advice to women.

My comment said: If everyone used the term ‘killing a child by abortion’ instead of just ‘abortion’ then there would be no need for counselling as women and young girls would be faced with the truth of what they are proposing to do.

Women actually don't need counselling as much as sound advice, which includes being told that it is wrong to kill an unborn child for whatever reason.


May Blossom Logo On 5 September 2011 The Daily Mail printed an article entitled Depression in women doubles since the 1970s as they 'try to have it all'.

My comment that was published said: So the rates of depression suffered by women that have risen since the 70s has nothing to do with the number of women that have killed their children by abortion and are actually suffering from PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) or PAS (Post Abortion Syndrome)?  It is strange that this is the time when The Abortion Act (1967) was implemented in this country.  Why didn’t the researchers take this into account when looking at the reasons for the higher rates of stress in women?  It is not just women who are more stressed by this but the whole of society as we live in a schizophrenic atmosphere where it is acceptable to kill unborn children but not acceptable to kill born children.  Is it any wonder the stress rates are not even higher?  The medical profession still refuse to accept that PTSD and PAS exist so what chance has anyone of overcoming this dreadful condition they are suffering from?

Why do the 'experts' refuse to see the obvious?


May Blossom Logo On 1 September 2011 The Daily Mail printed an article entitled Women who have abortions 'face double the risk of mental health problems'.  I did submit a comment but it was not published.

My comment said: I know the mental/emotional harm that the killing of a baby by abortion can cause from personal experience, and from helping others in the same position over the last 25 years. My own experience took place in 1972 and it took 11 years of guilty silence before I was able to admit it to anyone.  The majority of society is in denial when it closes it eyes to the killing of unborn children, yet is up in arms when a born child is killed.  The mother of the first knows she deserves punishment for killing her child, the killer of the second rightly is punished by society when they are found, tried and convicted.  Mothers that miscarry are encouraged to grieve the death of their child; mothers who kill their child by abortion are told to get on with their lives as it was their choice.  What mother wouldn’t suffer mentally when society chooses to say it is okay to kill your unborn child but not okay to kill your born child?  Please see May Blossom Ministries website for further information.

Just looking at some of the comments on the page shows that many women are still suffering from the pain of knowing that they killed their child by abortion.  But still society says it is not mentally harmful to the mother if she kills her unborn child.


May Blossom Logo On 1 August 2011 The Daily Mail printed an article entitled Women's Cancer Toll is Blamed on UK Lifestyle as One in Four Will Develop the Disease in Their Lifetime.

I submitted a comment that was red arrowed.  It read: A main reason for breast cancer, which governments are still not prepared to admit, is abortion, especially if it is the woman's first pregnancy.  This is due to the breast cells that have begun to differentiate into mammary gland cells being abruptly stopped when the pregnancy is artificially terminated early on in pregnancy.  As the number of abortions are rising, so the incidence of breast cancer is rising.  Statistics show that 1 in 3 women will have had an abortion which is more than reflected with the 4 in 10 women that will get breast cancer in the article.

Please pray for all women with breast cancer, no matter what the cause.


May Blossom Logo On 4 February 2011 The Daily Mail printed an article entitled One in eight women will get breast cancer as lifesyle blamed for huge rise in cases.

My comment which was not published said: One of the links to the rise of breast cancer not mentioned in the article is the killing of, in particular, the first child by abortion.  During a full term pregnancy the breast cells change to become milk producing cells, but if this pregnancy is stopped abruptly, especially in the first three months, then the cells do not get the opportunity to fully change and so can become cancerous in later life.  The rise of breast cancer has risen along with the rise of the numbers of babies killed by abortions, and the hormones that are in contraceptives.

See our website United for Life where there is an article that explains this further.  See http://www.unitedforlife.com/breastcancer.html.

For those already hurting because they have killed their child by abortion, how much more pain is caused to them when they realise that they may contract breast cancer years later because of the abortion and breast cancer link which 'experts' still refuse to acknowledge?


May Blossom Logo On 28 January 2011 The Daily Mail printed an artilce entitled Abortion 'does not increase risk of mental health problems... but having a baby does'.  I did submit a comment but it was not published.

My comment said: The figures taken to ‘prove’ that having a baby is more likely to cause mental health risks than killing a child by abortion are false as they only show women who are actually hospitalised.  If every woman who ever suffered from Post Abortion Syndrome, the name given to those with mental health problems following their child being killed by abortion, asked to be admitted to hospital, then the NHS would collapse overnight.  Women hide the pain through suppression and denial and it may not be until years later when something triggers the pain and breaks the denial that they may realise there is a problem.  Or they just know there is a problem but do not feel able to discuss it as it was their ‘choice’ to kill their child and the law says it is legal so why should they have a problem.  The issues are so very deep, but whilst many women do suffer following the birth of a baby they get help as it recognised that ‘post-natal depression’ is a genuine illness.  The medical profession still refuse to accept that women suffer following the death of their child by abortion and so the women have to suffer in silence.  Please visit our site May Blossom Ministries for help if you or someone you know is suffering in any way from the death of a child by abortion.

How desperate are those advocating killing babies by abortion to suggest it is safer than giving birth?


 
 
Copyright © 2008-15 by Grace Mason.